Refolk
9 min readMarkdown

a16z Cut Most of Its 34 Recruiters. Apply to the Startup's ATS Instead

a16z cut most of its portfolio recruiting team. Here is what that means for your talent network profile and how to apply to venture-backed startups directly.

If you uploaded a profile to the a16z talent network and expected someone to match you with a portfolio company, that person has probably left. On October 14, 2026, Axios reported that Andreessen Horowitz had laid off most of its 34-person portfolio recruiting team, the people who took talent-network profiles and passed them to a16z's startups. The jobs are still open, and the quickest way to them never went through the fund in the first place.

What did a16z actually cut?

a16z laid off most of its "full stack talent" team. That 34-person group recruited for the firm's more than 1,000 portfolio companies. The people who stayed are moving into individual investment groups. Dan Primack at Axios broke the story and posted it on X. The firm declined to comment.

Here is what the reporting says:

  • Scope: in Primack's words, a16z "laid off most of its exec recruiting team."
  • Collateral: the cuts reportedly also hit some staff on the TxO team.
  • What's left: the remaining members are being reassigned to specialized groups such as growth or crypto. Each group will build its own team for its own needs instead of relying on a central one.

The timing is rough. GoLayoffs counted 18 tech layoff events affecting 5,147 workers in October, and TrueUp's tracker shows 678 layoffs at tech companies with 198,532 people affected so far in 2026. If you were laid off this year and planned to lean on a fund's talent team for startup introductions, that route just got much narrower.

Is the a16z job board still worth using?

Yes, but use it to find roles, not to apply. A VC portfolio job board pulls its listings from each startup's applicant tracking system and careers page. Every role on it also lives on the company's own site, and an application there goes to whoever owns the role.

An applicant tracking system (ATS) is the software a company uses to collect, sort and route applications to its hiring team. A VC talent network is a database of candidate profiles that a fund keeps so its portfolio companies can search it. Most of these boards and networks run on two platforms, Getro and Consider. On Getro, you have to sign up separately for each network you want to join.

Before the cut, a16z's board listed 690 portfolio companies with 18,386 open roles. Those listings sync from the startups' own systems, so the cut doesn't remove any jobs. What a16z removed was the person who read your profile and made an introduction. Without that person, your talent-network profile is just a row in a database, waiting for a portfolio company to search for it.

Apply to the same job through the startup's own ATS and it shows up in the queue of the person responsible for filling it. One path waits for someone to find you. The other puts your application in front of the hiring team.

A talent-network profile waits to be found. An application in the startup's own ATS gets read by someone who is hiring.

How much matching was the talent team really doing?

For most candidates, almost none. Divide a16z's 18,386 open portfolio roles by a 34-person team and each person was covering about 541 roles before anyone was laid off.

541
Open a16z portfolio roles per talent-team member, before the cut

18,386 listed roles divided by a 34-person team. If at least 18 people left, each remaining person covers about 1,150.

No one hand-matches candidates to 541 open roles. Primack described the people cut as the exec recruiting team, which tells you where that attention went: senior searches. The senior engineer, data analyst or growth marketer who submitted a profile was mostly never in that queue.

That's the less obvious point about this news. The cut doesn't take away a service that most job seekers were actually getting. It makes official something that was already true for anyone below executive level: the profile was passive, and the application to the startup's ATS was what did the work.

Who actually decides who gets hired at a startup?

People inside the startup, not partners at the fund. In Refolk's index of professional profiles, talent leaders at US software and internet startups outnumber talent partners at VC and PE firms by about 5.3 to 1.

Group (US)CountSource
Talent partners / heads of talent at VC/PE firms88Refolk's index
Recruiters / talent acquisition at VC/PE firms116Refolk's index
Founding recruiters / heads of talent / talent partners at software and internet startups462Refolk's index
Startup talent leaders per VC talent partner≈5.3x462 ÷ 88

A few caveats. These counts depend on how employers are tagged by industry, so treat them as lower bounds. Some of the 116 VC/PE recruiters work at private equity firms like H.I.G. Capital and have nothing to do with startup hiring. a16z appears as a top employer in both VC groups. The ratio is more reliable than any single count, and the ratio favors the startups.

A founding recruiter is the first dedicated recruiting hire at a startup. That person, or the head of talent who comes later, decides which applications reach a hiring manager. In Refolk's index, companies like Warp, Polymarket, Applied Intuition, Lorikeet and Maximor AI all have someone in one of these roles. If you want to know how to get a job at a startup, start with that person, not with whoever at the fund invested in the company.

Why do executives and senior operators lose the most?

Senior candidates lose the most because the team that was cut served them most directly. Primack described it as a16z's exec recruiting team. Mid-level engineers and analysts mostly applied through the ATS anyway, but senior candidates who relied on talent-partner introductions now have to reach founders themselves.

That channel also kept things quiet. If you're a director at a public company, you can't turn on "open to work" or have recruiters calling your current office. A talent partner could put your name in front of a founder without your employer finding out. That quiet path for running a search while still employed is now much thinner at a firm with more than 1,000 portfolio companies.

Without the talent partner, senior candidates have to go to the founder themselves. In practice:

  • Find the founder or CEO of the startup you want, and the head of talent if there is one.
  • Send one short, specific note that names the stage problem you would solve, for example "you just raised your Series B and need a finance function that survives an audit."
  • Bring proof. Attach a resume written for that company's stage, not a general executive bio.

How do you apply to startups directly?

Find the role on the board, click through to the startup's own careers page, and apply there with a resume rewritten for the company's funding stage. Funding stage matters more than the investor's name, because a seed company and a growth-stage company need very different things from the same job title.

  1. Use the board to search. Filter jobs.a16z.com, or any Getro or Consider board, by function and focus area. The board is good for discovering companies.
  2. Click through to the company's careers page. Confirm the role is live in the company's own ATS and apply there. You get the same job and a direct route to the person who owns it.
  3. Work out the stage. Look up the most recent funding round. Seed, Series A, Series B and growth companies are hiring to solve different problems.
  4. Rewrite your resume for that stage. See the breakdown below.
  5. Find the founding recruiter or head of talent. A two-line note after you apply, pointing to the one line on your resume that matters most for them, does more than a talent-network profile ever did.
  6. Write a cover letter that explains why this company, at this stage. A generic note about loving startups doesn't tell them anything.

What to lead with at each stage

  • Seed and pre-seed: range and speed. Show what you shipped alone, the systems you built from nothing, and the times you covered two jobs.
  • Series A: first versions of repeatable process. Show where you turned something ad hoc into something the team could run without you.
  • Series B: scaling what already works. Show growth you handled, hires you onboarded, and the reliability or cost problems you fixed.
  • Growth stage: depth and coordination across teams. Show the size of what you owned and the teams you worked with.

The same history becomes four different resumes depending on what you put first. That rewrite is the work Refolk takes off your plate. Paste the posting, and I rewrite your own history for that company's stage, then score how well you actually fit before you spend an application on it. A low fit score is useful too. It tells you to skip the role or reach out to someone first instead of applying cold.

Should you still join a VC talent network?

Join a network only where someone still reads the profiles, and never treat joining as the same thing as applying. a16z's own College Talent FAQ says it plainly: "We are not recruiters for a16z or our portfolio companies."

A blanket "never join" would be wrong, though. Programs inside a16z, such as the speedrun accelerator, still promise that "a speedrun partner reads every profile." The talent work isn't going away. It's moving into each investment group, and those groups are building their own hiring teams around their focus areas.

Here's how to decide:

  • Join when the program explicitly says a person reviews profiles and the group's focus (AI, crypto, growth) matches your experience.
  • Skip generic fund-wide networks that are just a Getro signup form. You'd have to register network by network, and nobody is assigned to read you.
  • Always apply anyway. Even in a network that's actively staffed, send the application to the startup's ATS as well. One path doesn't rule out the other, and the direct one is where hiring decisions happen.

Target the focus area and the funding stage, not the fund's brand. A Series A crypto company and a growth-stage AI company in the same portfolio have very little in common when it comes to hiring.

FAQ

Is the a16z talent network shut down?

Nothing in the reporting says the network or the job board has closed. What changed is the team behind it. Axios reported on October 14, 2026 that most of the 34-person portfolio recruiting team was laid off and the rest moved into investment groups. The board still pulls listings from portfolio companies, but far fewer people are available to read profiles and make introductions.

How do I find who is hiring at a startup?

Look for the founding recruiter, head of talent or talent partner on the startup's own team. In Refolk's index, these roles at US software and internet startups outnumber talent partners at VC and PE firms by about 5.3 to 1 (462 vs. 88). At very early companies with no recruiter yet, the founder or CEO usually does the hiring.

Should I mention the VC firm in my application?

Only if it's relevant to the job. Saying you want to work at "an a16z company" tells a founder nothing. Naming their stage, their most recent raise and the specific problem that raise creates shows you understand where the company is. Write to the stage, not to the investor.

The data behind this

Put this to work

Paste your career in once. Every application after that is written for you.

Drop a resume or a LinkedIn URL. I rank the live openings against it, rewrite the resume and write a cover letter for the best of them, and fill in the employer's form when you press the button. You read, you decide what goes out.

  1. 01Drop your resume

    A PDF or a LinkedIn URL. About a minute, once.

  2. 02I rank the openings

    Every weekday morning, the live catalog scored against your history. Up to 20 worth your time, not two hundred links.

  3. 03Each one is written up

    Resume rewritten for the posting, a cover letter, a fit score. Press send, or let me fill in the form.

  • New matches ranked and written before you are up.
  • Every bullet stays inside what your history supports. Nothing invented.
  • Queued, submitted, interviewing, offer: one screen, not a spreadsheet.

Free, no card. Up to 25 applications sent a week, and nothing is sent until you say so.

Keep reading