I apply to
the jobs.
You interview.

No. That is the part I take over. Every morning I rank the live openings against your history, drop anything you have already applied to, allow one role per company so it never reads as a bot, and write up the best of what is left. You wake up to finished applications instead of a list of links to work through.

Only where it should. Each application arrives finished, and one button sends it: I open the employer's form and fill it in, down to the resume and the letter. Switch that on for the daily run and it happens without you. What I will not do is answer a question you have never answered, or send the same application twice, so anything I am unsure of comes back to you with the link.

The systems most companies host their forms on: board links from Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, and Workable are recognised and driven end to end, and a company's own careers page is usually a thin wrapper around one of them. Workday puts account creation in front of the form, so those come back to you with the link rather than having an account opened in your name on a site you have never seen.

No, and there is nowhere to put one. I never create an account on an employer's site, never work around a login wall, and never answer a CAPTCHA. Each of those stops the send and hands you the posting instead, which is the honest outcome rather than a quiet failure.

No. The prompt is explicit that every company, title, date, number, and technology has to come from what you provided, and missing details get left out rather than guessed at. If a bullet looks wrong, it came out of your source text, and you can edit it.

They will read a resume written from your own history, in your own material, with your numbers. What gives AI-written applications away is genericness: identical phrasing across candidates, claims with nothing specific behind them, and a cover letter that would suit any company. Tailoring per posting is the opposite of that, and one role per company per run means nobody receives five near-identical applications from you in a morning.

The order of your bullets, which skills lead, and the summary. It reweights what is already true. If a posting asks for something you have never done, that shows up as a gap in the fit notes, not as a new line on your resume.

A 0 to 100 read on how well your history matches one specific posting, plus a short note on the strongest overlap and the clearest gap. It is deliberately blunt. A score under 40 usually means your time is better spent elsewhere.

Nothing. Reading your history, writing your resume, rewriting it for each posting, the cover letters, the fit scores, and the tracking are all free, however many you run. The one number to know is that I send 25 applications a week for you, also free. No card is taken at any point.

Yes, in one switch, and it starts stopped. Picking and sending are two separate settings, both off until you turn them on, and turning either back off takes effect on the next run. A day where nothing scored high enough produces nothing, which is the behaviour rather than an outage.

When you land the job. Until then it runs every week, and the only other things that stop it are a week where nothing scored high enough to be worth your name, or a week where all 25 sends have already gone out.

No. Your profile, resumes, and applications are yours. Nothing you write here is shown to the recruiters who use the other side of the product.